The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in
the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of
the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed
articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon
standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the
author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society of society-owned or
sponsored journals. This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific
Ethical responsibilities of authors
Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in
the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific
endeavour. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by
following the rules of good scientific practice, which include:
- The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
- The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the newwork concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the reuse of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (‘self-plagiarism’)).
- A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time.
- No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions
- No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (‘plagiarism’). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted.
- Important note: the journal uses software to screen for plagiarism.
- Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities - tacitly or explicitly - at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
- Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.
- Authors are strongly advised to ensure the correct author group, corresponding author, and order of authors at submission. Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript.
- Adding and/or deleting authors at revision stage may be justifiably warranted. A letter must accompany the revised manuscript to explain the role of the added and/or deleted author(s). Further documentation may be required to support your request.
- Requests for addition or removal of authors as a result of authorship disputes after acceptance are honoured after formal notification by the institute or independent body and/or when there is agreement between all authors.
- Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc. Sensitive information in the form of confidential or proprietary data is excluded.
If there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an investigation. If, after
investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be
contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been established
beyond reasonable doubt, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the
following measures, including, but not limited to:
- If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.
- If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases retraction of the article will occur.
- The author’s institution would be notified.